Aspen Technology Aspen Process Manual Contents www.aspentech.com   support.aspentech.com 
Web site | Process Manual > Solids and separation > Slurry handling | Word index

Slurry 2: Pipelines for Slurries and Pastes

Slurry 2: Pipelines for Slurries and Pastes
     Part 1: Pipeline Design for Slurries and Pastes
         1. INTRODUCTION
             1.1 Introduction to Slurry Pipeline Design and Scope of the Review
             1.2 Types of Pipeline Application
             1.3 Classes of Slurries and Pastes
                 1.3.1 Non-Settling Slurries
                 1.3.2 Settling Slurries
                 1.3.3 Distinguishing between Settling and Non-Settling Slurries for the Purpose of Pipeline Design
                 1.3.4 Turning Settling Slurries into Non-Settling Slurries
                 1.3.5 Applications of the Concept of a Heavy Medium
             1.4 Slurry Pipeline Design Philosophy
                 1.4.1 General
                 1.4.2 Recommended Design Procedure(s) for Use with Non-Settling Slurries
                 1.4.3 Recommended Design Procedure(s) for Use with Settling Slurries
                 1.4.4 Overview of Slurry Pipeline Design
         2. TESTWORK FOR SLURRY OR PASTE CHARACTERISATION
             2.1 Parameter Measurement for Settling Slurries
                 2.1.1 Measurement of Particle Size Distribution and Specific Gravity
                 2.1.2 Particle Drag Coefficient Determination
                 2.1.3 Particle Concentration
                 2.1.4 Coefficient of Friction Measurement
             2.2 Flow Curve Determination for Non-Settling Slurries and Suspensions
                 2.2.1 Use of Rotational and Tube Viscometry
                 2.2.2 Obtaining the Flow Curves of Dense Suspensions and Pastes
                 2.2.3 Yield Stress Measurement
                 2.2.4 The Determination of the Presence of Thixotropy and Its Rheological Characterisation
                 2.2.5 Wall Slip Effects in Viscosity Measurement
                 2.2.6 Rheological Characterisation of Slurries or Suspensions containing Coarse Particles
                 2.2.7 Rheological Measurements on Settling Suspensions
                 2.2.8 Data Reduction and Curve-Fitting
         3. PRESSURE DROP-FLOWRATE PREDICTION FOR NON-SETTLING SLURRIES
             3.1 Newtonian Materials
                 3.1.1 Laminar Flow
                 3.1.2 Turbulent Flow
                 3.1.3 Transition Region
             3.2 Non-Newtonian Fluids
                 3.2.1 Laminar Flow
                 3.2.2 Turbulent Flow
                 3.2.3 The Transition Region
             3.3 Other Effects Determining Head Losses
                 3.3.1 Effect of Wall-Slip in Laminar Flow
                 3.3.2 Effect of Pipe Wall Roughness in Turbulent Flow
             3.4 Guidelines for using the Design Methods discussed for Non-Settling Slurries
                 3.4.1 Limitations of Design Methods
                 3.4.2 Factors Affecting Choice of Viscometric or Pilot-Scale Design Techniques
                 3.4.3 Guidelines for using Viscometric Methods
         4. PRESSURE DROP-FLOWRATE RELATIONSHIP FOR SETTLING SLURRIES
             4.1 The Flow Regimes
                 4.1.1 Homogeneous Flow
                 4.1.2 Heterogeneous Flow
                 4.1.3 Flow with Contact Load
             4.2 A Survey of the Available Correlations
                 4.2.1 Correlations for Predicting the Pressure Gradient for Flow without a Contact Load
                 4.2.2 Correlations for Predicting the Pressure Gradient for Flow with a Contact Load
                 4.2.3 Recently Advanced Comprehensive Formulae Applicable to All Flow Regimes
                 4.2.4 Correlations for Predicting the Pressure Gradient for Systems containing Suspended Particles as well as a Contact Load
                 4.2.5 Prediction of the Pressure Gradient for Dense Phase Hydraulic Conveying
                 4.2.6 The Prediction of Pressure Gradient for the Flow of Settling Slurries Containing a Wide Particle Size Distribution
                 4.2.7 Pressure Gradient for the Flow of Settling Slurries in Inclined Pipes
             4.3 Guidelines for Their Usage
                 4.3.1 Some Reasons Explaining the Discrepancy in Predictions of the Pressure Gradient using Different Correlations
                 4.3.2 Recommendations for the Use of the Different Correlations
                 4.3.3 The Determination of the Optimum Specific Power Consumption for the Transport of a Settling Slurry (using the Lazarus and Nielson 146 Correlation)
             4.4 Scale-Up of Pipeline Tests for Settling Slurries
                 4.4.1 Scale-Up Approaches Valid for Fully Suspended Flow
                 4.4.2 Scale-Up Approaches Valid for Slurry Flow Including a Contact Load
             4.5 Recommendations for Future Work on Predicting the Pressure Gradient for the Flow of Settling Slurries
         5. PREDICTION OF THE MINIMUM OPERATING VELOCITY (AND OTHER DESIGN-RELATED VELOCITIES) FOR THE FLOW OF SLURRIES WHICH MAY SETTLE
             5.1 A Summary of the Various Definitions of Design-Related Velocities
             5.2 A Survey of the Available Correlations
                 5.2.1 Summary of Carleton and Cheng's Review on Design-Related Velocities for Settling Slurries
                 5.2.2 Correlations for Predicting Design-Related Velocities Published Subsequent to the Review of Carleton and Cheng 177
                 5.2.3 The inclusion of a High Solids Concentration And/Or a Wide Particle Size Distribution
                 5.2.4 Theoretical Attempts to Predict Design or Minimum operating Velocities
                 5.2.5 Prediction of Design-Related Velocities under Laminar Flow Conditions
                 5.2.6 The Case Where the Sliding Bed Velocity Occurs Within the Transitional Flow Regime
                 5.2.7 Influence of Pipe Inclination on Suspending and Sliding Bed Velocities
             5.3 Guidelines for the Usage of the Various Correlations discussed for Design-Related Velocities
                 5.3.1 Comparisons of the Correlations
                 5.3.2 Guidelines for the Use of Different Correlations
                 5.3.3 Scale-Up Procedures to Enable Design or Minimum Operating Velocities to be obtained and Future Research Requirements
         6. HEAD LOSSES THROUGH FIXTURES AND FITTINGS
             6.1 Correlations for Newtonian Fluids
                 6.1.1 Turbulent Flow
                 6.1.2 Laminar Flow
             6.2 Correlations for Non-Newtonlan Fluids (i.e. most Non-Settling Suspensions)
                 6.2.1 Turbulent Flow
                 6.2.2 Laminar Flow
             6.3 Correlations for Settling Slurries
         7. TIME EFFECTS IN PIPELINE DESIGN
             7.1 Start-Up, Shutdown and Flow Transient Effects
                 7.1.1 Starting and Stopping
                 7.1.2 Acceptable Slope
                 7.1.3 Transient Flow Effects
             7.2 Significance of Thixotropy in Start-Up and in Continuous Operation
                 7.2.1 The Use of Computer-Aided Mathematical Modelling for the Prediction of Start-Up Characteristics with Thixotropic Slurries
                 7.2.2 Scale-Up of Start-Up Characteristics in Thixotropic Pipe Flow
             7.3 Particle Degradation
             7.4 Alternative Pipe Wall Linings to Reduce Wall Wear Rates
                 7.4.1 Pipeline Wear
                 7.4.2 Pipeline Materials of Construction
                 7.4.3 Pipeline Protection
             7.5 Use of Pigs and High Velocity Jets to Clean Pipes and Clear Blockages
         8. METHODS OF REDUCING HEAD LOSSES IN PIPE FLOW
             8.1 Effect of Additives
                 8.1.1 Addition of High Molecular Weight Polymer
                 8.1.2 Use of Soaps
                 8.1.3 Use of Electrolyte
             8.2 Effects of Vibration
                 8.2.1 Oscillation of Slurry Flowrate or Pressure Gradient
                 8.2.2 Vibration or Oscillation of Pipe
             8.3 Air Injection
             8.4 Effect of Fibres in Suspension
             8.5 Use of Modified Geometries to Pipe Cross-Section
                 8.5.1 Helical Ribs
                 8.5.2 Segmented Pipe
             8.6 Concluding Remarks
         9. SOME CASE STUDIES OF PIPELINE DESIGN
             9.1 Non-Settling Slurry Case Studies
                 9.1.1 Clay Slurry (Kenchington Data)
                 9.1.2 Sewage Sludge (WRC Sludge Pumping Steering Group)
             9.2 Settling Slurry Case Studies
                 9.2.1 Hydraulic Transport of Limestone Aggregate
                 9.2.2 Sand and Gravel Case Study
                 9.2.3 The Loveridge Coarse Coal Slurry Pipeline Project
             9.3 Long Distance Pipelines in Operation
                 9.3.1 The Gladstone Limestone Pipeline
                 9.3.2 The Black Mesa Coal Slurry Pipeline in the USA
             9.4 Economic Viability of Long-Distance Pipelines
                 9.4.1 Advantages and Disadvantages of Hydraulic Transport
                 9.4.2 Economics of Hydraulic Transport
         10. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
             10.1 Non-Settling Suspensions
             10.2 Settling Slurries
         11. CONCLUDING REMARKS
         12. REFERENCES
         13. NOTATION
         14. APPENDIX A: COMPUTER MODELLING OF START-UP PIPELINE FLOW CHARACTERISTICS FOR THIXOTROPIC FLUIDS
             14.1 Start-Up Flow Under Constant Applied Pressure
             14.2 Computer Program for Constant Applied Pressure
             14.3 Start-Up With Variable Flowrate
             14.4 Computer Program for Variable Flowrate
             14.5 Reference
             14.6 Notation to Appendix A
         15 APPENDIX B: ADDRESSES OF BHR GROUP AND THE STA
         16 APPENDIX C: EXAMPLES DEMONSTRATING THE MECHANISTIC APPROACH OF CLIFT ET AL FOR SCALE-UP OF SETTLING SLURRY PIPELINES
         17 APPENDIX D: A NEW APPROACH FOR DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN SETTLING AND "NON-SETTLING" SLURRIES
             17.1 Background
             17.2 Examples of the Importance of Settling Behaviour in Pipe Flow
             17.3 The New Philosophy
     Part 2: Pipeline Designs for Settling Slurries
         1. INTRODUCTION
             1.1 Introduction to Slurry Pipeline Design
             1.2 Objectives and Scope of This Guide
             1.3 Further Information
         2. PROCEDURE
             2.1 Introduction
             2.2 Description of the Main Flowchart
         3 SPECIFICATION OF DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
             3.1 Systems Containing Pipe Sections of Different Orientation
             3.2 Examination of Design Parameters
                 3.2.1 Pipe Diameter
                 3.2.2 Slurry Concentration
                 3.2.3 Particle Size
                 3.2.4 Throughput
         4. DESIGN PROCEDURE FOR HORIZONTAL PIPE SECTIONS
             4.1 Introduction
             4.2 Description of Flowchart 2 (Fig 4.1)
             4.3 Procedure for Flowchart 2 (Fig 4.1)
         5. DETERMINATION OF THE MINIMUM OPERATING VELOCITY FOR HORIZONTAL PIPES
             5.1 Step 5.1 - Determination of a Suitable Flow Regime
                 5.1.1 Description of Flow Regimes
                 5.1.2 Procedure
             5.2 Determination of the Minimum Operating Velocity
                 5.2.1 The State-of-the-Art of Predictive Methods
                 5.2.2 Step 5.2 - Procedure for Determining the Minimum Operating Velocity for Heterogeneous Flow, V h
                 5.2.3 Step 5.3 - Procedure for Determining the Minimum Operating Velocity for Moving-Bed Flow, V b
         6. DETERMINATION OF PRESSURE DROP FOR HORIZONTAL PIPE SECTIONS
             6.1 State-of-the-Art of Predictive Methods
                 6.1.1 Empirical Approach
                 6.1.2 Analytical Approach
             6.2 Procedure for Calculating the Pressure Drop
                 6.2.1 2-Layer Model Approach
                 6.2.2 Empirical Approach
                 6.2.3 Effect of a Wide Particle Size Distribution
                 6.2.4 Small-Scale Tests
         7. DESIGN PROCEDURE FOR VERTICAL PIPE SECTIONS
             7.1 Introduction
             7.2 Description of Flowchart 5 (Fig 7.1)
             7.3 Procedure for Flowchart 5
         8. DETERMINATION OF THE MINIMUM OPERATING VELOCITIES FOR VERTICAL PIPES
             8.1 Step 8.1 - Procedure for Upwards and Downwards Flow
             8.2 Minimum Operating Velocity for Upwards Flow
                 8.2.1 State-of-the-Art of Predictive Methods
                 8.2.2 Steps 8.2 to 8.4 - Procedure for Determining the Minimum Operating Velocity for Upwards Flow
             8.3 Steps 8.5 and 8.6 - Procedure for Determining the Minimum Operating Velocity for Downwards Flow
         9. DETERMINATION OF THE PRESSURE DROP FOR VERTICAL PIPE SECTIONS
             9.1 State-of-the-Art of Predictive Methods
                 9.1.1 Prediction of Pressure Drop
                 9.1.2 Prediction of In Situ Concentration
             9.2 Procedure for Calculating the Pressure Drop
             9.3 Effect of a Wide Particle Size Distribution
         10. DESIGN PROCEDURE FOR INCLINED PIPE SECTIONS
             10.1 Introduction
             10.2 Description of Flowchart 8, Fig 10.1
             10.3 Procedure for Flowchart 8, Fig 10.1
         11. DETERMINATION OF THE MINIMUM OPERATING VELOCITY FOR INCLINED PIPES
             11.1 State-of-the-Art of Predictive Methods
             11.2 Procedure for Determining the Minimum Operating Velocity
                 11.2.1 Step 11.1 - Determination of a Suitable Flow Regime
                 11.2.2 Steps 11.2 and 11.3 - Determination of the Minimum Operating Velocity for Moving-Bed Flow, V d
                 11.2.3 Steps 11.4 and 11.5 - Determination of the Minimum Operating
         12. DETERMINATION OF THE PRESSURE DROP FOR INCLINED FLOW
             12.1 State-of-the-Art of Predictive Methods
             12.2 Procedure for Determining the Pressure Drop
                 12.2.1 Procedure for Heterogeneous Flow Where the Angle of Inclination is Greater than 60?#176;. (The angle of inclination is depicted in Fig 12.2
                 12.2.2 Procedure for Moving-Bed Flow or Where the Angle of Inclination is Less than 60?#176;. (The angle of inclination is depicted in Fig 12.2
             12.3 Effect of a Wide Particle Size Distribution
         13. DETERMINATION OF PRESSURE LOSSES THROUGH FITTINGS
             13.1 Introduction
             13.2 State-of-the-Art of Predictive Methods
             13.3 Procedure
         14 OPTIMISATION AND SELECTION OF SUITABLE DESIGN PARAMETERS
             14.1 General Procedure
             14.2 Details of Specific Steps in Flowchart 11, Fig 14.1
                 14.2.1 Step 14.5 - Selection of Optimum Design Parameters
                 14.2.2 Step 14.6 - Effect of Changes in the Operating Conditions
         15. NOTATION
         16. REFERENCES
         17 APPENDIX A - PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINING WHETHER A SLURRY CAN BE CONSIDERED AS SETTLING OR NON-SETTLING WITH REGARD TO PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION
             17.1. Introduction
             17.2. Procedures
                 17.2.1 Option One: Comparison of Slurry Residence Time in the Pipe and Particle Settling Rates
                 17.2.2 Option Two: Use of Aude et al A2 Chart
                 17.2.3 References
         18 APPENDIX B - WORKED EXAMPLES
             18.1 HORIZONTAL PIPE FLOW
             18.2 VERTICAL PIPE FLOW
             18.3 INCLINED FLOW
         19 APPENDIX C DETERMINATION OF VARIABLES REQUIRED IN THE DESIGN CALCULATIONS
             19.1. Determination of the Particle Drag Coefficient. C D .
             19.2. Determination of the Particle Reynolds Number, Re o and the Terminal Settling Velocity of a Particle, V o
             19.3 Determination of the Solid to Pipe Wall Coefficient of Friction, m f
         20 APPENDIX D COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR THE 2-LAYER MODEL
     Part 3: Pipeline Designs for Non-Settling Slurries
         1. INTRODUCTION
             1.1 Important Parameters in Pipeline Design
             1.2 Are You Dealing with a "Non-settling" Slurry or is Settling Likely to be Significant?
             1.3 Typical Design Philosophies
                 1.3.1 Transporting Slurry with Fixed Characteristics with Some Variation
                 1.3.2 Transporting Slurry where Significant Variation in Slurry Characteristics are Possible for Design Optimisation
                 1.3.3 Hydraulic Conveying of Solids at a Required Rate and at Minimum Cost
         2. SPECIFICATION OF DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
             2.1 Design of a New Pipeline
             2.2 Use of an Existing Pipeline for a Different Slurry
                 2.2.1 Inner Pipe Diameter and Wall Roughness
                 2.2.2 Maximum Allowable Absolute Pressure
                 2.2.3 Assessment of Pipeline Elevation Changes
                 2.2.4 Assessment of Type and Number of Fittings
         3. OVERALL PIPELINE DESIGN PROCEDURE
             3.1 Procedure for Pressure Loss Estimation across Pipeline
         4. ESTIMATION OF SLURRY PROPERTIES UNDER RELEVANT CONDITIONS
             4.1 Specification of Conditions for Flow Property Measurement
                 4.1.1 Shear Rate Range to be Covered in Viscometric Tests for Pipeflow
                 4.1.2 Shear Rate for Coarse Particle Support for the Design of Semi-Stabilised or Stabilised Slurries
             4.2 Flow Property Characterisation Using Small-Scale Tests
                 4.2.1 Tube or Rotational Viscometry?
                 4.2.2 Generation of the Laminar Flow Curve and Flow Model Curve Fitting
             4.3 Settling Tests to Check Non-Settling Assumption
             4.4 Slurry Density Measurements
         5. FRICTIONAL PRESSURE DROP ESTIMATION FOR LAMINAR FLOW
             5.1 Calculation Procedure for Slurry with any Laminar Flow Property
                 5.1.1 Estimation of Laminar Flow Limit
                 5.1.2 General Calculation Procedure
                 5.1.3 Calculation Procedure for Laminar Flow Data from Tube or Pipe Viscometer
             5.2 Calculation Procedure for Newtonian Slurry (Constant Viscosity)
                 5.2.1 Estimation of Laminar Flow Limit
                 5.2.2 Pressure Loss Estimation
             5.3 Calculation Procedure for Non-Newtonian Slurry (Variable Viscosity)
                 5.3.1 Estimation of Laminar Flow limit for Different Non-Newtonian Flow Models
                 5.3.2 Pressure Loss for Power Law Slurry
                 5.3.3 Pressure Loss for Bingham Plastic Slurry
                 5.3.4 Pressure Loss for Generalised Bingham Plastic Slurry (Yield-Pseudoplastic)
                 5.3.5 Pressure Loss for Casson Model Slurry
         6. FRICTIONAL PRESSURE DROP ESTIMATION FOR TURBULENT FLOW
             6.1 Calculation Procedure for a Newtonian Slurry (Constant Viscosity)
                 6.1.1 Smooth Pipe
                 6.1.2 Rough Pipe
             6.2 Calculation Procedure for a Non-Newtonian Slurry (Variable Viscosity)
                 6.2.1 Non-Newtonian Slurry with Non-Specific Laminar Flow Property
                 6.2.2 Power Law Slurry
                 6.2.3 Bingham Plastic Slurry
                 6.2.4 Generalised Bingham Plastic Slurry (Yield-Pseudoplastic or Herschel-Bulkley Model)
                 6.2.5 Casson Slurry
         7. PRESSURE DROP ESTIMATION ACROSS VARIOUS PIPE FITTINGS
             7.1 Pressure Losses from Fittings in the Laminar Flow Regime
                 7.1.1 Newtonian Slurry
                 7.1.2 Non-Newtonian Slurry
             7.2 Pressure Loss from Fittings in the Turbulent Flow Regime
                 7.2.1 Newtonian Slurry
                 7.2.2 Non-Newtonian Slurry
             7.3 The Two-K Method
         8. ESTIMATION OF OVERALL PRESSURE LOSS
             8.1 Specification of Pipe Wall Thickness
             8.2 Implications for Pump Selection and Sizing
         9. OPTIONS FOR MINIMISING PRESSURE LOSS
             9.1 Increasing Pipe Diameter
             9.2 Addition of De-flocculating Agent
             9.3 Mechanical Agitation prior to Pumping
             9.4 Oscillating the Flow
             9.5 Vibrating the Pipe
             9.6 Designing for Water Injection (or other Carrier Liquid)
             9.7 Designing for Air Injection
         10. WORKED EXAMPLES
             10.1 Design of a New Pipeline
                 10.1.1 For Laminar Flow
                 10.1.2 For Turbulent Flow
             10.2 Use of an Existing Pipeline for a Different Slurry
             10.3 Design of a Pipeline with Several Pipe Fittings
         11. NOTATION
         12. SOURCES OF BACKGROUND INFORMATION
         13. REFERENCES
         14 APPENDIX A: PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINING WHETHER A SLURRY CAN BE CONSIDERED AS SETTLING OR NON-SETTLING WITH REGARD TO PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION
             14.1 Introduction
             14.2. Procedures
                 14.2.1 Option One: Comparison of Slurry Residence Time in the Pipe and Particle Settling Rates.
                 14.2.2 Option Two : Use of Aude et al Chart.
             14.3 References
         15 APPENDIX B: PROCEDURE FOR ESTIMATION OF PIPE WALL ROUGHNESS USING WATER (OR OTHER SUITABLE NEWTONIAN LIQUID)
             15.1 Introduction
             15.2 Procedure
         16 APPENDIX C: PUBLICATIONS ON PIPEFLOW AND TRANSPORTATION (1964-1992)
             16.1 GENERAL AND REVIEW PAPERS
             16.2 NON-NEWTONIAN FLUIDS - Design Procedures
             16.3 NON-NEWTONIAN FLUIDS - The WSL Design Procedure
             16.4 THIXOTROPIC FLUIDS
             16.5 FIBROUS SUSPENSIONS
             16.6 FAST-SETTLING SUSPENSIONS AND COARSE MATERIALS
             16.7 GAS-LIQUID FLOWS
             16.8 GAS-SLURRY FLOWS
             16.9 PIPELINE INSTRUMENTATION
     Part 4: Pipeline Cleaning Techniques
         1. INTRODUCTION
             1.1 Mechanisms responsible for laydown of deposits and their removal
             1.2 Main pipe cleaning methods
             1.3 Concept of Cleaning-in-Place (CIP)
                 1.3.1 Particular requirements in the food industry
                 1.3.2 Influence of surface roughness on cleanability
                 1.3.3 Effect of surface potential
         2. USE OF PIGS
             2.1 Application areas
             2.2 General system description
             2.3 Different pig designs
                 2.3.1 Cup or disc type
                 2.3.2 "Polly-pig" (polyurethane foam) and other foam types
                 2.3.3 Spherical type
                 2.3.4 Various commercial designs
             2.4 Pigging operating conditions
                 2.4.1 Propelling fluids
                 2.4.2 Fluid Pressures
                 2.4.3 Pig velocities
                 2.4.4 Pig materials
             2.5 Pig launching/receiving chambers
             2.6 Pipeline design considerations
                 2.6.1 Pipe wall thickness
                 2.6.2 Pipe bends
                 2.6.3 Flanges
                 2.6.4 Valves
             2.7 Case studies of use of pigs
                 2.7.1 General
                 2.7.2 Water Industry
                 2.7.3 Oil industry
                 2.7.4 Paints
             2.8 Costs of pigging systems
         3. ELECTRO- OR HYDRO-MECHANICAL METHODS
             3.1 General system description
             3.2 Types of tool used
                 3.2.1 Brush
                 3.2.2 Surface scraper
                 3.2.3 Serrated rotor
                 3.2.4 Spear blade
                 3.2.5 Drills and Carbide cutter
                 3.2.6 Saw blade
                 3.2.7 Hook
                 3.2.8 Knife head
             3.3 Application areas
         4. USE OF HIGH PRESSURE/VELOCITY JETS
             4.1 Application areas
             4.2 General system description
                 4.2.1 High pressure water jets
                 4.2.2 High pressure dry ice jets
                 4.2.3 High velocity gas jets carrying cleaning agents
             4.3 Pressure ranges used
             4.4 Other design variables
         5. CHEMICAL WASHING
             5.1 Acid washing
         6. HYDROPNEUMATIC METHODS
             6.1 Introduction
             6.2 Calculation of wall shear stress in presence of gas
             6.3 Comparison of cleaning efficiency with liquid alone
         7. SELECTION OF SUITABLE PIPE CLEANING METHOD
             7.1 Influence of deposit type and amount
             7.2 Influence of pipe length, diameter and bends
             7.3 Influence of pipe wall material
             7.4 Detection and clearance of blocked pipeline
         8. AVOIDANCE OF PIPE CLEANING
         9. CONCLUDING REMARKS
         10. REFERENCES
             10.1 General
             10.2 Pipeline pigging
             10.3 Cleaning using high pressure/velocity liquid or gas jets
             10.4 Chemical cleaning
             10.5 Cleaning using hydromecanical method
             10.6 Hydropneumatic methods
             10.7 Deposit prevention techniques
             10.8 Studies of solids deposition in pipelines
         11 PATENTS
         12 MANUFACTURERS OF SYSTEMS/PROVIDERS OF SERVICES
             12.1 General
             12.2 Pigging systems
             12.3 HIGH PRESSURE/VELOCITY SYSTEMS
             12.4 Specialist suppliers
     Part 6 : Review of pipeline frictional pressure losses
         1. INTRODUCTION
             1.1 Pressure Losses and Loss Coefficients
                 1.1.1 Pressure Losses Across Fittings
                 1.1.2 Laminar Flow Loss Coefficients
                 1.1.3 Turbulent Flow Loss Coefficient
                 1.1.4 Transition from Laminar to Turbulent Flow
             1.2 Notation of Loss Coefficients for Various Fittings
             1.3 Fluid Classification
             1.4 Rheological Characterisation
                 sh_2_6-20t.gif
                 Figure 1.6 Idealised flow curves of time-independent fluids (Alderman, 1996)
             1.5 Flow Behaviour and Choice of Rheological Model
                 1.5.1 Newtonian Behaviour and Newtonian Model
                 1.5.2 Shear-thinning and Shear-thickening Behaviour and Power Law Model
                 1.5.3 Metzner-Reed Generalised Approach
                 1.5.4 Bingham Plastic Behaviour and Bingham Plastic Model
                 1.5.5 Viscoplastic Behaviour and the Herschel-Bulkley Fluid Model
             1.6 Reynolds Number
                 1.6.1 Newtonian Reynolds Number
                 1.6.2 Metzner-Reed Generalised Reynolds Number
                 1.6.3 Slatter Reynolds Number
             1.7 Types of Fluids Tested in Published Literature on Pipe Fittings
             1.8 Types of Fittings Tested in Published Literature on Pipe Fittings
                 sh_2_6-36t.gif
                 sh_2_6-37t.gif
                 sh_2_6-38t.gif
                 sh_2_6-39t.gif
                 sh_2_6-40t.gif
                 sh_2_6-41t.gif
                 b) Elbows (often standard “off-the-shelf”)
                 · Contractions and Expansions
                 d) Gradual contractions and expansions
                 e) Valves
                 A summary of the fittings and valves typically tested for loss coefficient data that were found in the literature are given in Table 1.6 to Table 1.8.
                 A summary of the fittings and valves typically tested for loss coefficient data that were found in the literature are given in Table 1.6 to Table 1.8.
         2. BENDS
             2.1 Introduction
                 2.1.1 Circular-arc Bends
                 2.1.2 Elbows
             2.2 Flow Phenomena
                 2.2.1 Newtonian Fluids
                 2.2.2 Non-Newtonian Fluids
                 2.2.3 Settling Slurries
             2.3 Laminar To Turbulent Transition
                 sh_2_6-55.png
                 sh_2_6-56.png
                 sh_2_6-57.png
                 sh_2_6-58t.gif
                 Figure 2.8 Variation of Recrit with rc/D (data from Ma, 1987)
             2.4 Summary of Loss Coefficient Information
                 2.4.1 Laminar Flow
                 2.4.2 Turbulent Flow
             2.5 Prediction of Loss Coefficients and Comparison with Experimental Data
                 2.5.1 Newtonian Fluids
                 2.5.2 Non-Newtonian Fluids
                 2.5.3 Circular-arc Bends
                 2.5.4 Elbows
                 2.5.5 Settling slurries
                 2.5.6 Method to Predict Pressure Losses using Cbend and kbend
             2.6 CFD analysis to extend experimental data
                 2.6.1 Modelling individual fittings
                 2.6.2 Taking advantage of symmetry to reduce computations
                 2.6.3 Grid characteristics
                 2.6.4 Balancing run time vs accuracy and grid sensitivity
                 2.6.5 Sensitivity to turbulence intensity and Reynolds number
                 2.6.6 Determining the fitting loss using CFD
             2.7 Guidelines for choosing bends
             2.8 Conclusion
                 sh_2_6-79.png
                 sh_2_6-80.png
                 sh_2_6-81.png
                 sh_2_6-82.png
                 sh_2_6-83.png
         3. CONTRACTIONS
             3.1 Introduction
                 sh_2_6-84t.gif
                 sh_2_6-85.png
                 Figure 3.1 Pressure drop at various axial positions along a contraction (Hwang & Pal, 1997)
             3.2 Flow Phenomena
                 3.2.1 Newtonian fluids
                 3.2.2 Non-Newtonian Flow
             3.3 Laminar to Turbulent Transition
             3.4 Summary of loss coefficient information
                 3.4.1 Laminar flow and Turbulent flow
             3.5 Prediction of Loss Coefficients and Comparison with Experimental Data
                 3.5.1 Laminar Flow
             3.6 CFD analysis to extend experimental data
                 3.6.1 Turbulent Flow
                 3.6.2 Laminar Flow
             3.7 Conclusion
                 sh_2_6-110.png
                 sh_2_6-111.png
                 sh_2_6-112.png
                 sh_2_6-113.png
                 sh_2_6-114.png
                 sh_2_6-115.png
         4. EXPANSIONS
             4.1 Introduction
                 sh_2_6-116.png
                 sh_2_6-117t.gif
                 Figure 4.1 Pressure distribution at various axial positions along a sudden expansion (ESDU, 1972)
             4.2 Flow Phenomena
                 4.2.1 Newtonian fluids
                 4.2.2 Non-Newtonian fluids
             4.3 Laminar to Turbulent transition
             4.4 Summary of Loss Coefficient Information
                 4.4.1 Laminar and Turbulent Flow
             4.5 Prediction of Loss Coefficients and Comparison with Experimental Data
                 4.5.1 Newtonian fluids
                 4.5.2 Non-Newtonian fluids
             4.6 Conclusion
                 sh_2_6-137.png
                 sh_2_6-138.png
                 sh_2_6-139.png
                 sh_2_6-140.png
                 sh_2_6-141.png
                 sh_2_6-142.png
                 sh_2_6-143.png
                 sh_2_6-144.png
         5. VALVES
             5.1 Introduction
             5.2 Flow Phenomena
             5.3 Laminar to Turbulent Transition
             5.4 Summary of loss coefficient information
                 5.4.1 Laminar flow
                 5.4.2 Turbulent flow
                 sh_2_6-145.png
             5.5 Prediction of Loss Coefficients and Comparison with Experimental Data
                 5.5.1 Newtonian fluids
                 5.5.2 Non-Newtonian fluids
                 5.5.3 Settling slurries
             5.6 CFD analysis to extend experimental data
             5.7 Conclusions
                 sh_2_6-159.png
                 sh_2_6-160.png
                 sh_2_6-161.png
                 sh_2_6-158.png
         6. CONCLUDING REMARKS
         7. REFERENCES
         8. NOMENCLATURE
             sh_2_6-162.png
         sh_2_6-1.png

 

Volume SH 2: Part 1 Pipeline Design for Slurries and Pastes

This part reviews the knowledge related to the process design of the pipeline itself a slurry transport system. The part has been written assuming that either of two basic design paths is followed, depending on whether the slurry for which the design is to be completed can be considered a non-settling suspension or must be treated as a settling slurry. The emphasis is on frictional pressure loss estimation, and the use of different flow models for non-settling slurries. In addition to frictional pressure loss for settling slurries, the prediction of the limit deposit velocity for horizontal pipeflow is also discussed.


Volume SH 2: Part 2 Pipeline Design Methods for Settling Slurries

This part provides a step-by-step calculation procedure for determining the pressure drop, minimum flow velocity and the optimum operating conditions for the transport of settling slurries by pipeline. Procedures for horizontal, vertical and inclined lines are presented and losses due to pipe fittings are also taken in account.

The optimum values of the design parameters (e.g., pipe diameter, flow velocity and slurry characteristics) depend on how these parameters affect the capital and running costs for the whole pipeline system and on the effects of likely changes in the operating conditions under normal operation.

The results obtained using this part are suitable for feasibility and preliminary design methods. They also provide a sensible starting point for the design of full scale tests which are necessary if accurate design data are required.

The part is being developed further into software.


Volume SH 2: Part 3 Pipeline Design Methods for Non-Settling Slurries

This part gives procedures for calculating the total pressure loss for the pipeflow of non-settling slurries which may be treated as pseudohomogeneous mixtures. This pressure loss comprises frictional losses arising from flow through straight sections of pipe and through various types of pipe fitting, together with pressure losses (or gains) arising from changes in pipe elevation. For frictional loss estimation, both the laminar and turbulent flow regimes are considered, and methods to predict the point of laminar flow breakdown for slurries exhibiting different non-Newtonian behaviour.

Five alternative flow models are assumed as the starting point for frictional pressure loss estimation : Newtonian, power law, Bingham plastic, generalised Bingham plastic (also known as yield-pseudoplastic) and Casson models. The guide provides a step-by-step procedure for frictional pressure loss estimation and provides several detailed worked examples.

Section 3 provides the summarised step-by-step procedure. This procedure draws on detailed discussion of viscometry to characterise the slurry flow properties (section 4), the prediction of laminar flow breakdown and estimation of frictional pressure loss (section 5), the prediction of frictional pressure loss for flow in smooth or rough pipe (section 6), and the estimation of frictional pressure loss for flow through a range of commonly-used pipe fittings (section 7).

This design guide has been developed further into software called PipeDes.


Volume SH 2: Part 4 Pipeline Cleaning Techniques

This part describes the various techniques and technologies available for pipe cleaning. Pipes are cleaned internally either to remove debris and deposits which remain after the pipe system has been constructed but before the pipework is used, or to loosen and scour internal pipe surfaces which become fouled over time by deposits which can reduce the pipe diameter, so increasing frictional losses and reducing the flowrate, or to remove fluid material so that different fluids may be put down the same pipe without contamination. In the food industry, regular cleaning-in-place is required for hygiene reasons.

Much of the available open literature which has been collected so far pertains to the requirements of the oil industry, where waxy deposits are often laid down onto internal pipe surfaces during the flow of crude oil, and which require regular removal. In this industry, various designs of "pig" with their associated launch systems have been developed. Pipeline pigging is also used in other industries such as water and paint. In addition to pigging, there are other mechanical devices which cut and/or scrape material from the pipe wall as the device moves along the pipe. These devices may be actuated electrically, hydraulically or pneumatically. High pressure water jets, or high velocity gas streams laden with cleaning agent, is also commonly employed to break-up and remove hardened deposits.

Much of the open literature on pipeline cleaning is not related specifically to slurry pipelines. Because of this, the information contained in this part includes reference to other pipe cleaning applications. It is considered that many of the techniques described, together with the associated equipment, could be readily applied to slurry systems, although this is not always specifically stated in the literature.


Volume SH 2: Part 5 Selection and Design of Pipeline Cleaning Systems

The focus of this part will be on pig clearing systems that are "In-Process" - i.e. within the processing plant rather than any offshore or across-land larger diameter applications. However, where there is information that is general to slurry lines, it has been included. The maximum diameter considered will be 8" / 200mm, although many of the application will still be valid for larger diameters.

In the middle of the document is a form of interactive logic diagram (CD ROM based) to allow users to set up design parameters for the optimum choice of pig clearing equipment. This is based on factors ranging from basics such as reasons for pig clearing the pipeline, through to the detail of electrical requirements, product data, utilities calculations, elastomer choice and certification requirements.

To assist with the build up of the whole design picture, the document also outlines the Utilities requirements and calculations for typical systems, plus some tips to ensure potential problems are designed out of the systems at an early stage.

To complete the picture, there are several case studies from the various pig system suppliers. These concentrate on both run-of-the-mill applications, such as emulsion paint applications, up to the greater challenges of high viscosity and difficult slurries that require attention to minimisation of particle breakdown, etc.

For the purpose of this document, the definition of a slurry is any product having a solids content whilst still being pumpable. The carrier for the solids can be any type of liquid. This definition encompasses applications that range from clay based products, through paints, foodstuffs, chemicals and pharmaceuticals